000			01886nam a22002657a 4500
008			230110t2022 fr |||||s|||| 00| 0 spa d
040			_cES-MaBCM
100	1		_9124553 _aPortela, Clara
245	1	0	_aSlow-acting tools _b: Evaluating EU sanctions against Russia after the invasion of Ukraine _cClara Portela, Janis Kluge _h[Recurso electrónico]
260			_aParís _b : European Union Institute for Security Studies _c , 2022
300			_a8 p.
490	0		_aBrief _v11
504			_aBibliografía: p. 7-8
520			_aWithin the toolbox of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), sanctions have indisputably become the instrument of choice. Even before the invasion of Ukraine started on 24 February 2022, observers highlighted that most CFSP decisions concerned the imposition, renewal or updating of sanctions. Because of their versatility, Brussels employs sanctions to respond to a vast array of foreign policy challenges: democratic backsliding, human rights violations, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, the misappropriation of state assets, and even human trafficking. As with all controversial tools, sanctions are subject to great scrutiny, and their usefulness is ultimately judged against their performance. In addition to denouncing their negative impact on the population, detractors typically highlight their lack of effectiveness. But how do we know whether and when sanctions are effective?
610	2	7	_aUnión Europea _2 _952895
650		7	_aSanción económica _2
650		7	_aPolítica exterior _2
650		0	_aConflicto entre Rusia y Ucrania
650		7	_aGuerra _2
651		4	_aRusia _9115522
651		4	_aUcrania _9115932
856			_uhttps://mpr.bage.es/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=7c6ec71db9177d76f54c71fe2499edd7 _yDESCARGAR DOCUMENTO
942			_cLE
999			_c223534 _d223534