000			01962nam a22002537i 4500
001			218158
003			ES-MaBCM
005			20240919062901.0
008			210520t2020 ne |||||s|||| 00| 0 e d
040			_cES-MaBCM
100	1		_9125685 _aMackie, James
245	1	0	_aPromoting policy coherence _h[Recurso electrónico] _b : lessons learned in EU development cooperation _cJames Mackie
260			_aMaastricht _b : European Centre for Development Policy Management _b : Cascades _c, 2020
300			_a31 p. _b : graf.
490		0	_aPolicy brief
504			_aBibliografía: p. 29-30
520			_aPolicy coherence for development, or PCD, refers to the need for multiple policies from different sectors to work in unison rather than in opposition to each other, if international development is to be achieved. In Europe, the argument for PCD was based on the recognition that EU efforts on development cooperation were often contradicted or undermined by other EU policies, both internal as much as external, to the extent that the EU was effectively taking back with one hand what it had given with the other. In some severe cases, the EU was even taking back more than it gave. Thus for instance, while on the one hand the EU was funding development projects to support agriculture production projects in Africa, on the other, its trade policies and domestic agriculture subsidy policies in Europe were encouraging the dumping of cheap subsidised food on African markets thereby undercutting local producers competing in the same markets. The impact of European development aid was therefore being negated by its trade and agriculture policies.
610	2	7	_aUnión Europea _2 _952895
650		7	_aCooperación internacional _958138
650		7	_aAyuda al desarrollo _957670
650		7	_aClima _957938
856			_uhttp://mpr.orex.es/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=32825499aeb88e9fdbdaa9a72e102a99 _yDESCARGAR DOCUMENTO
942			_2udc _cLE
999			_c218158 _d218158