000 02916nam a2200289 i 4500
001 200805
003 ES-MaBCM
005 20230225081330.0
008 160201t2014 uk||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 _a978-0-19-870237-5
021 _axx
035 _a(OCoLC)890627813
040 _cES-MaBCM
245 0 0 _aSelf-determination and secession in international law
_cedited by Christian Walter, Antje Von Ungern-Sternberg and Kavus Abushov
250 _a1st. ed.
260 _aOxford :
_bOxford University Press,
_c2014
300 _aXIV, 318 p.
_c24 cm
500 _aÍndice analítico
504 _aIncluye referencias bibliográficas
520 _aPeoples and minorities in many parts of the world assert a right to self-determination, autonomy, and even secession from a state, which naturally conflicts with that state's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The right of a people to self-determination and secession has existed as a concept within international law since the American Declaration of Independence in 1776, but the exact definition of these concepts, and the conditions required for their application, remain unclear. The Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice concerning the Declaration of Independency of Kosovo (2010), which held that the Kosovo declaration of independence was not in violation of international law, has only led to further questions. This book takes four conflicts in the post-Soviet Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) as a starting point for examining the current state of the law of self-determination and secession. Four entities, Transnistria (Moldova), South Ossetia, Abkhazia (both Georgia), and Nagorno-Karabakh (Azerbaijan), claim to be entitled not only to self-determination but also to secession from their mother state. For this entitlement they rely on historic affiliations, and on charges of discrimination and massive human rights violations committed by their mother state. This book sets out its analysis of these critical issue in three parts, providing a detailed understanding of the principles of international law on which they rely: The first part sets out the contours and meaning of self-determination and secession, including an overall assessment of secession within the Commonwealth of Independent States. The second section provides case studies investigating the events in Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Nagorno-Karabach in greater detail. The third and final section extends the scope of the examination, providing a comparative analysis of similar conflicts involving questions of self-determination and secession in Kosovo, Western Sahara, and Eritrea.
650 2 7 _aAutodeterminación
_957654
650 7 _aDerecho internacional
_958329
700 1 _949020
_aWalter, Christian
700 1 _9119802
_aUngern-Sternberg, Antje Von
700 1 _9119803
_aAbushov, Kavus
942 _cBK
_2udc
999 _c200805
_d200805