The Asseriveness of the European Commission in the Enforcement of Fundamental Values : the impact of the Russia-Ukraine War Andreína V. Hernández Ross [Recurso electrónico]
Tipo de material:
TextoSeries Documento de trabajo ; Serie, Unión Europea y Relaciones Internacionales ; 138/2023Detalles de publicación: Madrid : CEU Ediciones , 2023Descripción: 92 pTema(s): Recursos en línea: Resumen: The outlook facing the European Union (EU) today is disquieting –even ominous. Europe is not only facing a “state of generalised noncompliance” (Batory, 2016: 685-699) where separate instances of noncompliance –arising in many areas of EU rules and policies– have concurred, resulting in its increased frequency and visibility. Moreover, several national governments have made far-reaching changes to their countries’ political systems. Jan-Werner Müller has defined this anomaly as ‘constitutional capture’,1 a phenomenon by which a government systematically dismantles checks and balances, limits the independence of the judiciary, destroys press freedom, attacks civil society, increases executive power and, essentially, undermines the rule of law (RoL) –all through legal means (Palombella, 2016: 49).
Recurso electrónico para descargar
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biblioteca Central del Ministerio de la Presidencia Recurso electrónico | En línea | No para préstamo |
Bibliografía: p. 58-79
The outlook facing the European Union (EU) today is disquieting –even ominous. Europe is not only facing a “state of generalised noncompliance” (Batory, 2016: 685-699) where separate instances of noncompliance –arising in many areas of EU rules and policies– have concurred, resulting in its increased frequency and visibility. Moreover, several national governments have made far-reaching changes to their countries’ political systems. Jan-Werner Müller has defined this anomaly as ‘constitutional capture’,1 a phenomenon by which a government systematically dismantles checks and balances, limits the independence of the judiciary, destroys press freedom, attacks civil society, increases executive power and, essentially, undermines the rule of law (RoL) –all through legal means (Palombella, 2016: 49).
